Manuscript Critique - Non-Fiction
In a non-fiction manuscript critique, I'm assessing whether the content is clear, compelling, and well-organized and if the manuscript effectively communicates its ideas to the intended audience. I also focus on the credibility of the information, engagementstrong> level, and practicality of the content.
Here's what I look for:
I want to ensure the manuscript has a clear and well-defined purpose. It should be easy for the reader to understand what the author is trying to convey. This could be a thesis, argument, or central message.
Does the manuscript stay focused on its purpose throughout?If the manuscript veers off-topic or becomes too broad, the critique would suggest tightening the focus.
Non-fiction should speak to a specific group. The tone, language, and level of detail should be appropriate for the target readers—whether it's industry professionals, academics, or general readers.
Is the tone and writing style consistent with the intended audience?A professional business book requires a different tone than a self-help book, for example.
I evaluate whether the manuscript flows in a coherent and structured manner. Chapters should be well-organized, with clear transitions between sections. Each section should build on the previous one and lead naturally to the next.
Does the manuscript have a strong introduction and conclusion?The introduction should grab the reader's attention and clearly outline the purpose, while the conclusion should summarize key points and provide a clear call to action or takeaway.
I look for whether the author backs up their claims with credible evidence, examples, or case studies. The manuscript should include relevant data, research, and expert opinions to support the main ideas.
Are the sources cited properly?For non-fiction, especially academic or research-focused manuscripts, proper citation of sources is key. I check for consistency and correct citation formats.
Even in non-fiction, the manuscript should be compelling and keep the reader interested. I evaluate whether the author uses varied sentence structure, clear explanations , and effective storytelling techniques to hold attention.
Is the writing clear and easy to follow?I check for clarity and simplicity in the writing. Non-fiction should be accessible to its audience, meaning jargon or overly complex phrasing should be minimal (unless it's relevant to the audience).
Non-fiction works should maintain a consistent tone and voice. Whether the tone is conversational, authoritative, or persuasive, it should not fluctuate wildly.
Is the manuscript cohesive?I check that the ideas in the manuscript are logically linked and there’s no confusion between sections.
Non-fiction manuscripts should offer unique insights, fresh perspectives, or solutions to problems. I look for whether the author brings something new to the table or if it feels like they’re rehashing old material.
For how-to guides, self-help books, business manuals, or other non-fiction genres, the manuscript should give readers actionable takeaways, solutions, or advice.
Are the examples and case studies relevant?The real-world examples should be pertinent to the manuscript’s message and help readers relate to the content.
I check for factual accuracy—whether the data, references, and quotes are correct. Inaccuracies or errors in fact can damage the credibility of the manuscript.
I evaluate whether the manuscript has the potential to engage, inform, and inspire its readers. Does it leave them with new knowledge, a sense of empowerment, or a shift in perspective?