Manuscript Critique - Fiction

I look for whether the storyline captures interest from the beginning and maintains tension throughout. Does it keep the reader wanting to know what happens next?

A well-organized manuscript should have a clear beginning, middle, and end. Does the plot flow naturally, and are there logical transitions between scenes or chapters? Are there any sections that feel too slow or rushed?

The pace should be balanced. Does the manuscript drag in some places or feel too hurried in others? A critique should evaluate whether scenes unfold at the right speed to maintain engagement.

I assess whether the characters are multi-dimensional, with distinct personalities, motivations, and arcs. Do they feel real, or do they seem flat and one-dimensional?

I look for character actions, thoughts, and speech that match who they are supposed to be. Do their reactions make sense in the context of the story?

A critique should focus on whether the main characters experience meaningful development or transformation. Are their arcs satisfying and impactful?

I examine whether the dialogue sounds authentic to the characters and fits the tone of the story. Does it help reveal character, advance the plot, or deepen conflict?

Does each conversation reveal something important about the character, setting, or story? Dialogue should never feel like filler.

I look at whether the environment (whether it's real-world or fantasy) is well described and feels alive. Is the setting developed enough to be integral to the story without overshadowing the characters?

In genres like fantasy or science fiction, the critique should focus on whether the world-building is coherent, unique, and well-integrated into the plot. Does the world feel believable and consistent?

I assess whether the narrative point of view (first person, third person, etc.) is consistent and well-chosen. Does the POV suit the story? Is the critique looking for areas where shifting between characters' perspectives becomes confusing or unclear?

The narrative voice (whether it's the narrator's or the protagonist's voice) should have a clear tone and personality. Does it feel fresh and engaging, or is it too passive or inconsistent?

I look for whether the manuscript conveys themes or underlying messages effectively. Are the themes well-developed throughout the story, or do they feel tacked on?

A critique should assess whether the themes are thought-provoking and add layers to the story, or if they feel superficial or overly obvious.

Conflict is essential to any narrative. Does the manuscript establish clear stakes, both internal (emotional, psychological) and external (action-based)? Is the protagonist motivated by the conflict, and does it feel significant?

The critique should evaluate if the stakes are substantial enough to keep readers invested in the outcome. Are the consequences of failure clear and meaningful to the characters and the reader?

A critique should highlight moments where the story falls into familiar patterns or tropes, especially if they don't serve the plot or character development in a unique way.

I look for areas where the manuscript feels fresh and unique and where the author has avoided predictable storylines and characters.

I assess whether the manuscript connects with readers on an emotional level. Are there scenes that move the reader? Does it build tension, joy, sorrow, or anger effectively?

In fiction, characters often undergo an emotional journey. I look at whether the emotional stakes are clear and whether the characters' emotional changes feel authentic.

I assess whether the opening hooks the reader, whether the pacing maintains interest throughout, and if the conclusion leaves a lasting impact.

The manuscript should never feel stagnant. A critique should identify any areas where the story seems to lose momentum or where sections could be tightened to keep readers engaged.